• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Dancing Priest

Author and Novelist Glynn Young

  • HOME
  • BLOG
  • BOOKS
    • Brookhaven
    • Dancing Prince
    • Dancing Prophet
    • Dancing Priest
    • A Light Shining
    • Dancing King
    • Poetry at Work
  • ABOUT
  • CONTACT

Characters

Rereading the “Dancing Priest” Series

April 9, 2025 By Glynn Young Leave a Comment

Someone once asked me if I reread my own books after they’re published. And the answer is yes. Part of the reason is research and “story-checking.” When I was writing the Dancing Priest series, I had to reread the early books to make sure I was keeping story line, characters, and settings consistent and accurate. 

But I must confess that, sometimes, I reread the books simply for pleasure. Occasionally, I get so wrapped up in the stories that I forget I wrote them. I suppose that’s a good thing. Yes, I have favorite scenes in every book that I like to reread, but I do reread the books in their entirety, about once a year.

I’ve had readers tell me that they reread the Dancing Priest series, too. Last week, Bill Grandi, a pastor in Indiana, started writing about it at his blog Living in the Shadow. This is part of what he had to say about the first book, Dancing Priest; he captured the very heart of the story in just a few words:

“Glynn has weaved together a wonderful story that even a non-religious person would enjoy. Even though Michael is a fictional character, one begins to admire this young man and his passion for life. Grounded without being preachy, Dancing Priest is a wonderful story of faith, hope, caring for others, putting other’s interests before your own, and being sensitive to those around us.”

And here’s what Bill wrote about the second one, A Light Shining, after summarizing a conversation between the Anglican priest Michael Kent and a 15-year-old boy on the steps of Michael’s church in San Francisco:

“…Each one of us matters to God. He sent Jesus to die so that we could be forgiven. While a story written by Mr. Young, the conversation is heard all over the planet. Every person has value and merit. Each one matters. We are all sinners, for sure, but we still matter to God.”

It might be time to reread my books (again). Thank you, Bill Grandi.

Sometimes Fiction Imitates Life

July 24, 2024 By Glynn Young 2 Comments

You read a book like A Place on Earth by Wendell Berry, and you’re reminded of your own family and where you came from. Characters like Burley Coulter and Uncle Jack seem to be almost lifted wholesale from what I remember of many of the “characters” I knew as a child.

My father’s family lived mostly in the Shreveport, Louisiana, area, with a much larger group in Brookhaven, Mississippi (it was my grandfather who would wander away from Brookhaven and settle first in central Louisiana, in a town called Jena. He was working as a surveyor for a railroad company, and he lived in a boarding house operated by my great-grandmother and his eventual mother-in-law. 

My father and his three sisters were all born in Jena but had moved to Shreveport by the late 1920s. Rubye was the oldest, followed by my Aunt Myrtle, my father, and my Aunt Ruth. There would have been an Aunt Elouise, born two years before my father, but she died the same year my father as born.

Each summer, from the time I was 8 to about 13, I would fly to Shreveport to spend a week with my grandmother. My grandfather had died when I was nine months old, so I never knew him. My grandmother lived across the street from my father’s oldest sister (and the family’s firstborn) and her husband. Aunt Rubye and Uncle Revis were responsible for some of my most vivid memories of Shreveport.

Both were “characters,” Aunt Rubye only slightly more staid than Uncle Revis. She was famous for her looks of disapproval and her biscuits. He wore a cowboy hat and drove a gigantic Dodge that was a faded pink and only slightly smaller than an ocean liner. My grandmother usually ate her lunch and dinner with them, which meant I did, too, when I visited. My visits usually coincided with harvesting the acre of vegetable gardens they had behind their small frame house. I learned to dig up potatoes, pick corn (and when to know it was ready), pick green peans (and help shell them; no body ate for free). 

The Lennon Sisters

Saturday evenings were devoted to watching the Lawrence Welk Show on television. I wasn’t a particular fan, but the best part was the running commentary on the individual acts from Uncle Revis. My favorite part was when the Lennon Sisters performed. You would hear my uncle begin to mutter until he couldn’t stand it any longer. He’s shout “Ignorant!” at the television set. “They’re ignorant1” My grandmother would smile, my Aunt Rubye would roll her eyes, and I’d go off into gales of laughter. I suspect that his commentary was for my benefit and amusement.

He’d let me tag along with him when he ran errands. He always seemed to have a pipe in his mouth, even when he wasn’t smoking it. We’d go tooling all over Shreveport in that big Dodge. I’d go with my grandmother when she had errands to run as well. She drove a black 1940 Ford that always, always was breaking down, usually in a part of town you didn’t want to break down in. I met the most interesting people because of that car’s problems.

Uncle Revis hated one thing even more than the Lennon Sisters. 

Cats. 

When I was about 10, I was sitting with him on the back steps after dinner. For whatever reason, we had no garden duties that might. It was one of those beautiful Southern summer evenings, still light. He was smoking his pipe, and he was talking about his favorite writers, of which James Michener was No. 1 on the list. Suddenly, he grabbed a rifle from behind us (which I didn’t know he had at hand) and fired off a shot at the fence between his yard and the neighbor’s house next door. A cat went flying in the air. 

The next-door neighbor loved cats, with at least a dozen and often more roaming around. If they stayed at the neighbor’s house, Uncle Revis would have been fine. But, as all of them were outdoor cats, they roamed the outdoors. And they seemed to know that Uncle Revis didn’t like them. All the more reason to visit.

Aunt Rubye came flying on to the back porch, shouting at my uncle. This might have been Shreveport in the 1960s, but firing a firearm inside the city limits was something only the police could do. But that wasn’t Aunt Rubye’s issue. 

What she was upset about was the reaction from the neighbors. As it turned out, they were their son’s in-laws. And they might, she said, breathing fire, think it was an insult aimed at them.

“Well,” Uncle Revis said, “they’d have to be pretty smart to figure that out. That won’t be a problem.”

Uncle Jack and Burley Coulter up in Port William, Kentucky would be proud. Yes, sometimes fiction does indeed imitate life.

Top photograph: My father and my Aunt Ruth in Jena, Louisiana, about 1923.

Do You Outline, or Do You Write into the Dark?

May 8, 2024 By Glynn Young Leave a Comment

A problem developed while I was writing my fifth novel. The problem had to do with what I conceived as a minor character – a four-year-old boy who would grow to adulthood during the story. But he wasn’t the main character; far from it, in fact. He was supposed to have a bit role.

Unfortunately, he had a different idea.

I kept floundering with the manuscript because this kid kept sticking his head in. It was as if he was demanding a bigger part of the story. I was hitting dead end after dead end, and my writing was going nowhere.

To continue reading, please see my post today at the ACFW Blog. 

Photograph by Steven Houston via Unsplash. Used with permission.

When Your Characters Take Over the Story

March 27, 2024 By Glynn Young 2 Comments

The title for this post is something of a “Well, duh” kind of title. For a story to work well, it’s the characters who have to take over and knock the author from his perch.

I’ve been reading Writing Better Fiction by Harvey Stanbrough, and he says that he almost called his book Writing Better Character-Driven Fiction, until he realized it was rather redundant. “All good fiction is character-driven,” he writes. He’s not big on outlines, plotting, character sketches, erecting signposts, or anything else that might smack of planning. Instead, he says, “like real life,” he says, “authentic fiction is not planned. Like real life, authentic fiction unfolds naturally.”

Stanbrough has an acronym for this – WITD, or “Writing into the Dark.”

As I’m reading this, I keep asking myself, is this how I write?

The answer is, yes, almost entirely.

I’ve written before about how a minor character became the heart of my fifth novel, Dancing Prince. He was supposed to stay in place. I thought I had a plan for the book in my head. But as I began to write, four-year-old Thomas kept sticking his head in where he was wanted or, I thought, needed. I finally relented and expanded his role a bit. That’s all the encouragement he needed. He took over. 

The book turned into a very different story from the one I’d originally intended. Good thing, too.

I’m currently in the thick of a new story. It’s a rewrite of an earlier manuscript that didn’t work. I’m not rereading the old manuscript as a guide. Instead, I’m letting the characters tell the story, and it’s becoming very different from that old manuscript.

But something similar to Dancing Prince has happened. A new character unexpectedly showed up. The main character is still the main character, but I was typing a scene where he’s leaving an apartment one morning. And for some unknown, crazy reason, this is what I typed next: “As he walked out the door, he saw a young man leaning against a motorcycle parked on the sidewalk.”

Where did that come from? I stared at the line. I read it out loud. I kept staring. And then I knew his name. I knew what he was doing. I knew what would happen next and how the entire story had just shifted. I set the characters free; they let me come along for the ride. Several complicated issues waiting for a solution suddenly were solved, because I let the characters solve them.

I said above that “writing into the dark” is almost entirely how I write. That qualifying phrase has to do with how a story forms in my head, long before (years in the case of Dancing Priest) before the first word lands on the computer screen. The stories I write essentially begin as short scenes in movies. I visualize them happening, slowly connecting the scenes until I can say a “whole story” has been visualized. 

But each scene in my head is character driven. And I mentally repeat each scene to watch what the characters do, and to see how the characters themselves change the scene. 

What’s clear is that I’m not the movie director. I may not even be the script writer. I think I’m more a technician standing in the shadows, assisting if needed, moving props around, painting a backdrop. 

But the characters are in charge.

Top photograph by Steven Houston via Unsplash. Used with permission.

Literary and Other Kinds of Fiction

March 20, 2024 By Glynn Young Leave a Comment

Wiseblood Books, which leans in the direction of being a Catholic publisher, has been issuing a series of novels and poetry collections that that interesting, thought-provoking, and broader than the idea of “Catholic publisher” might imply. Its novelists and poets include Dana Gioia, Marly Youmans, James Matthew Wilson, Samuel Hazo, Charles Hughes, Katy Carl, Sally Thomas, Glenn Arbery, R.R. Reno, and others.

What these writers have in common is that they write perceptively and unapologetically about faith, although it’s usually not that obvious. The fiction is serious, literary fiction; the poetry is just as serious, and just as literary. Both compare favorably to anything produced by mainstream, “secular” publishers. Wiseblood’s books aren’t out to score political points and tick the boxes of the latest social and cultural mania to seize the imaginations of what passes for America’s literary elites. 

Instead, they tell stories. They wrestle with what people wrestle with, including holding on to faith in a world growing more indifferent and more hostile.

I was reminded of this when I read a Wiseblood monograph, Christopher Beha: Novelist in a Postsecular World by Katy Carl. I’ve heard of Beha, a writer and novelist who served as editor of Harper’s Magazine from 2019 to 2023. He stepped down from the position for the best of reasons; he couldn’t balance his editorial duties with his writing.

Carl’s 32-page monograph explores Beha’s novels – The Whole Five Feet (2010), What Happened to Sophie Wilder(2012), Arts & Entertainments (2014), and The Index of Self-Destructive Acts (2020). And what she finds is that, in what describes as a “postsecular” world, raising the possibility of faith and belief is, well, okay. You can do it in serious fiction, and Beha does it very well, indeed. 

Carl is the editor in chief of Dappled Things Magazine. Her stories and articles have appeared in numerous literary publications, and she previously published the novel As Earth Without Water (2021) and a short story collection, Fragile Objects (2023). She was chosen as Wiseblood Books first writer in residence in 2020, and she is pursuing an MFA degree in creative writing at the University of St. Thomas in Houston., whose founding faculty were James Matthew Wilson and Joshua Hren.  

Katy Carl

Her essay on Beha’s novels repeatedly made me think about my own writing, and how I would describe it. I don’t write literary fiction. I can’t say I write “popular” fiction, or mass market fiction, either. When asked, I’ve said “contemporary fiction.” A few people have suggested “alternative history” or even “alternative future history.” More recently, it’s been historical fiction – no doubts about what to call a novel set during the Civil War and 1915. And now a new one is underway, and it’s definitely contemporary fiction. 

It may be a copout of sorts, but, setting labels aside, all authors have to write the story that’s asking to be written, because it’s a story that the author has to tell. 

I’ve gradually learned the importance of trusting my characters and writing like the writer Harvey Stanbrough describes – WITD, or “writing into the dark.” That means writing with no set outline but trusting your characters enough because they know what they’re doing. I learned that lesson with my last novel, Dancing Prince. One character refused to stay in the minor role I planned for him. I finally surrendered and gave him his head, and he took over. 

And it worked.

Related:

Fragile Objects: Short Stories by Katy Carl.

Wiseblood Books monographs.

Top photograph by Aman Upadhyay via Unsplash. Used with permission.

Christmas Oranges

December 7, 2023 By Glynn Young Leave a Comment

I have a new short story, “Christmas Oranges,” published today at Cultivating Oaks. It’s based on a work-in-progress, tentatively entitled Brookhaven. You can read the story here; the entire Christmas issue can be accessed here. 

The story, like the work-in-progress, is historical fiction, set in 1863 to 1865 during the Civil War, the Reconstruction period, and 1915. It is loosely (very loosely) based upon events in my own family, although the characters are entirely fictitious.

Photograph by Leonardo de Assis via Unsplash. Used with permission.

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 11
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

GY



Meet the Man

An award-winning speechwriter and communications professional, Glynn Young is the author of three novels and the non-fiction book Poetry at Work.

 

 01_facebook 02_twitter 26_googleplus 07_GG Talk

Copyright © 2025 Glynn Young · Site by The Willingham Enterprise · Log in | Managed by Fistbump Media LLC